Members of the Proposal Evaluation committee.

 

We have added some important new content to our site and hope that you will review it before making a decision.  This is one of the most important decisions that Boulder County will make this year.  We believe that it is worth the effort to get it right.

 

1. Some states choose "paper only"
    

2. Digital ballot equipment is not working
    

3. Boulder County Clerk pushes for unpopular digital ballots
    

4. AutoMark Federally certified, preferred by disabled voters.

 

We know that you are under pressure to select the only proposal offered.  We ask you report that the proposal does not meet the requirements, and to recommend that the Clerk not accept the proposal.

 

As a committee, you have several options:
  

1. You can report that the proposal fulfills all of the requirements, which we have shown it does not. 

2. You can report that the proposal does not fulfill all of the requirements. 

3. You can report that you have had inadequate time and expertise to determine with confidence that the proposal does or does not fulfill the requirements. 

If you do say that the proposal does fulfill the requirements (1 above), you would telling the citizens that the committee has carefully  evaluated all of the systems, functional, legal and other requirements specified in the RFP document.  It does not seem that there was time or talent to accomplish this.

 

If you do not say the proposal fulfills the requirements (2 or 3 above), the Boulder County Clerk can proceed without your endorsement, and might do so.  Please do not lend your good names to this risky venture.  The public and your friends will hold you personally accountable for what happens.  To the extent that you permit the report to infer that you represent an entire organization, you will be risking the good name of your organization.

 

You have been notified that there are many HART equipment problems underway today.  Our website includes several, but not all.  If you recall, the HART person who presented the demonstration told you that every HART voting terminal is identical.  This means that the problems being experienced throughout the country would be present in any equipment that Boulder County would rent.

 

We recommend that you do not bend to intimidating pressure from the Secretary of State’s office.  The SOS has made grievous certification errors and would like the counties to go along with bad SOS decisions to avoid embarrassment.    

 

Our elections are too important for this.  Please reject the pressure.

 

We have done what we can to warn each committee member of the needless risk they would be taking if they were to assert that they evaluated the proposal against each requirement and found that it fulfills every requirement.

 

We would hope that you list the few areas where you know that the proposal does not meet the requirements and recommend that the proposal be rejected.

 

Short of outright rejection, we recommend that you take a “no position” because you have had inadequate time and talent to perform a comprehensive evaluation of the proposal.

 

We know that this is a difficult situation for you.  We hope that you will do the right thing.  Please do not deceive voters into believing that the proposal is something it is not.

 

Thank you for your public service.

 

Al Kolwicz

CAMBER – Citizens for Accurate Mail Ballot Election Results

2867 Tincup Circle

Boulder, CO 80305

303-494-1540

AlKolwicz@qwest.net

www.users.qwest.net/~alkolwicz

www.coloradovoter.blogspot.com

 

CAMBER is a dedicated group of volunteers who are working to ensure that every voter gets to vote once, every vote is counted once, and that every ballot is secure and anonymous.