BEAR 100 MILE ENDURANCE RUN
SEPTEMBER 29, 30
IDAHO
Results courtesy of an email via Laurie Staton &
from <Letsrun100@aol.com> 10/01/00 08:54PM >>>

 1   Hal Koemer III, 24             23:29 (new male course record)
 2   Leland Barker, 42               23:58
 3   Betsy Kalmeyer, 39 (F)        25:47 (new female course record)
 4   Tim Seminoff, 42                27:50
 5   Phil Lowry, 34                   28:50
 6   Chris Miller, 29                 30:56
 7   Mary Workman, 39 (F)     31:37
 8   Darin Wells,                      34:31
 9   Errol Jones, 50                  34:46
20 starters
***************************************************************
 >>> <Letsrun100@aol.com> 10/04/00 12:26AM >>>
   Jim O'Neil & Sue Norwood
 "I know what I said the other night, but I didn't mean it, you know that."

 I'm referring to my babbling about never doing another 100 miler again. Sue
 listened patiently while I went through the list of reasons why we shouldn't
 be doing these things in the first place. That was at 11:00 PM Friday night,
 17 hours into the run, with 50 miles to go. We were traversing the mountain
 peaks in the Cache National Forest on the Bear 100 course. The night sky was
 absolutely full of brilliant stars. The Big Dipper sat on the mountain top
 directly in front of us and the Milky Way was the brightest I had ever seen
 it. Earlier in the day we had seen some of the most spectacular fall colors
 one could ever imagine. The maples and birches were a mixture of reds, greens
 and yellows patchworked in the mountain valleys as if they were placed by an
 artist's paint brush. The reasons all made sense to me at the time, but now I
 can hardly imagine I had made such statements.

 We spent a relaxing day driving to Preston, ID, stopping for a bowl of hot
 beef stew in West Yellowstone. As our drive took us farther south, we enjoyed
 the views of the Teton Mountains in Wyoming to the east and the Wasatch
 Mountains in Idaho to the west. We talked about our goals for the run and
 about Sue's last minute decision to join me on the Bear 100 course.
 Originally she had planned to crew and pace me, but she had been training
 hard for her 6th Mountain Masochist 50 Miler; why not give it a try?

 Arriving in Preston, we checked into our motel and headed for a pizza shop
 for dinner. The next morning, after a good night's rest, we drove to the
 start/finish area and hiked a mile or so on the first trail section. This is
 only the second year for the Bear so we had very little information about the
 course. The first and last miles are on the same paved road. The remainder of
 the course is on single and double track trail and dirt road. There are lots
 of ups and downs, almost 43,000 feet of change on sometimes dusty and
 sometimes rocky surfaces. It wasn't long before we decided to save our energy
 for the next morning. We spent the rest of the day getting our drop bags
 ready and watching Olympic events on TV.

 The prerace briefing was fun and informative. Leland Barker, the RD, held the
 meeting at his trout farm in Smithfield, UT, about 20 miles south of Preston.
 We weighed in, received our numbers and shirts, and listened carefully as
 Leland answered questions. Afterwards, a few of us, including Bozena
 Maslanka, Dick Curtis, Betsy Kalmeyer and her crewperson/mother, sampled the
 tasty salad bar at Ruby Tuesday in Smithfield. Sad to say we missed Steve
 Pero and Deb Reno who were sitting in a different area of the restaurant.

 Sue and I got a good night's sleep, but morning still came too early for me.
 The race started just a tad late and unlike the rainy start last year, the
 skies were clear. There were 20 starters that morning, but only nine would
 finish. As we made our way to the top of the first ridge, daybreak came. The
 colors were so spectacular I hardly noticed the difficult trail sections. The
 weatherman cooperated fully; the weather was perfect throughout the race.

 Trail marking was adequate, not overdone at all, just adequate. Actually,
 because of the limited markings we were forced to stay more alert, I think
 that made our trek more interesting. We never got lost, but did have some
 hesitation at a few of the turns and intersections. The choice of ribbon
 colors, yellow and orange, puzzled me some; with all the fall colors they
 were sometimes hard to spot. I was also using a four LED light after dark and
 they were impossible to see with this kind of lighting.

 The beautiful sunset came early, around 7:15 PM, that's usually the time I
 enjoy running the most.  This time though, I seemed to have lost all my
 energy. Although Sue seemed to be running strong, much stronger than I, she
 didn't have her usual drive. We had eaten at all the aid stations, gels,
 chips, beef stew from our drop bags, even had a hot dog at mile 44.

 Nothing was working for us. We just didn't want to be out there for another
 19 or 20 hours, and at the pace we were moving, that's how long it would have
 taken us to finish. We pulled into the 50 mile aid station and talked it
 over; neither of us had enough left for another 50.

 We were hoping we could get a ride back to the finish from a crew;
 unfortunately it was a fairly inaccessible aid station and no crews came.
 Fortunately for us though, the aid station people had the makings for two
 beds for two tired runners.  They improvised crude sleeping compartments made
 from 4'X6'X4" foam pads which they duct taped together on three sides. They
 were comfortable, but the cold night air still found its way in. We slept as
 best we could and as daylight broke decided to make a run for it. This was
 also the 90 mile aid station, so we only had ten easy miles to get us back
 home.

 Ha!! This "easy" ten mile section consisted of a newly constructed trail
 along the side of a mountain. Although it was fun and I'm glad we did it, it
 was tough. Betsy later described the section as "bushwhacking." Sue called it
 a mountain-goat trail.  I found it beyond words suitable for this forum. :)

 As I said, only nine out of twenty runners finished, a lower finish rate than
 last year. Maybe people just weren't aware of the difficulty of the course
 and weren't prepared. I believe that was the case with me. Next year, yes I
 will be back, I know what to expect and I will finish. I'm not out to settle
 a score or revenge a DNF, I really enjoyed the whole experience.

 The aid station folks are still fairly new, most aren't runners, but they did
 an outstanding job. They are genuinely caring and did the best they could;
 with experience they will improve. My hat is off to all of them, they all
 deserve special recognition.

 The post race dinner at the Deer Cliff Inn was excellent. Menu choices were
 steak, chicken and rainbow trout from Leland's trout farm. The dining area
 was outdoors next to a creek and we watched a mountain goat walk along the
 rocky edges a hundred feet up the side of a cliff. All the finishers received
 a personalized plaque AND a buckle. This year, for the first time, there were
 two Wolverine Buckles (under 24 hours) awarded:  24 year old Hal Koemer
 (23:29), last year's winner and Leland Barker (23:58). Hal won the race,
 beating Leland by only 29 minutes. Betsy Kalmeyer (25:47) won the women's
 race. Both division winners, who also set new course records, received
 beautiful handcarved wooden plaques.

 Leland has a first class race, it will only grow better, and I want to be a
 part of that growth. The Bear is very different from larger, more established
 100-milers we've run. It's small and personal, and very satisfying to be a
 part of it.

 Oh, the trip home was icing on the cake. We decided to get off the freeway
 for the return and diverted to Grand Teton and Yellowstone National Parks.
 Saw bison, elk, snow capped peaks and glaciers. Had lunch at the lodge and
 saw rainbows in the sky. Have I mentioned how much I love living out here?

 Good Running,
 Jim O'Neil (& Sue Norwood)
 Billings, Montana
***********************************************************

More...

 >>> "Pero, Stephen M" <PEROS@polaroid.com> 10/04/00 01:54PM >>>
 Ok, Ok...I see that Jim and Deb sent in their nice little reports on the
 race, so I guess I oughta put my 2 cents worth in...

 Awesome race! Great people! Nice views! ...but did that altitude ever
 suck...

 Yeah, who was I to think that I could just arrive at the race, which runs
 from 5000' to about 10,000 when I live at or below sea level. Even at
 Hardrock, I was there about 1 week ahead, did some high altitude hiking and
 still got severe headaches while trying to keep up with Sue Johnston, who I
 was supposed to be pacing.
 Same thing happened at the Bear...after a couple of hours I mentioned to Deb
 that I felt that familiar pressure behind my ears and knew it was going to
 be a long day and night. A couple of Tylenol (no, not ibuprofen) every now
 and then kept the edge off of it, but as the day wore on it just got worse.

 Deb and I had planned on just staying together to help get each other
 through this with some running, but mostly just an enjoyable power hike
 through the beautiful Wasatch Mountain range...We estimated about 28 hours
 and was on pace to do this at 50 miles and still moving quite quickly, but
 our ability to get good substantial fuel at the aid stations was for naught.
 Now, I am not AS bashing here...they were all friendly and wonderful people
 who volunteered their time to help a bunch of smelly, dirty runners run
 through their mountains. I just thought that in this type of run, the Aid
 Stations should have had more than crackers and M&M's...We needed soup and
 sandwiches to fuel our tiring bodies through the cold night on the ridgetop.
 We were getting to the point where We would rest by sitting on the side of
 the trail for a short spell (less than a minute) before trudging up the
 hills, but as the evening wore on, it was starting to get too cold to do
 that because We weren't creating enough heat to keep warm...it got mighty
 cold up on the ridgetop and when You got out of the trees, the wind would
 blow across and be even colder. We were tempted to get off the trail, curl
 up and take a short nap, but I was afraid that We wouldn't wake up...Oh, but
 what a sky!!!! And when Deb wanted to look at the Sky, she'd ask me to hold
 her to keep her from falling backwards...
 We had a great 57 mile run/hike in the mountains and if I had to, knowing
 the outcome, I'd still do it. As Deb said, We will have pictures of this and
 MMTR50 that I will have on a website for your viewing pleasure...
 So anyway what happened to Deb and me was that We began to bonk and Deb got
 severe nausea and I had my headache and was also having trouble staying
 awake and could not get coffee at the stations because it is Mormon country
 and they don't do caffeine..no Coke or coffee! So bring your caffeine pills
 next year if you run..which I do highly recommend. I will most likely be
 back next year if I don't kill myself at Hardrock first.

 This is only the 2nd year for this event and I'm so glad to have been a
 part of it in it's infancy...I will say here that this will be a much bigger
 event in the future as it is very much like Hardrock without the extreme
 climbs and altitude.
 I have emailed Leland Barker, the RD, and he assured me that the aid
 stations will be better next year..but I would still say to bring what you
 like and put it in drop bags.

 See some of you at David's MMTR50 in 2 weeks and also at the Chancellor
 Challenge this weekend. No, I'm not running it, just helping Ruthie Kessler
 get through it and also to see some of the fine ultra thoroughbreds in
 action.

 Steve Pero
 Bellingham, Mass.
 peros@polaorid.com
******************************************************************

 FYI...

 >>> <Runtrails1@aol.com> 10/05/00 05:48PM >>>
 Jim Garcia wrote about the Bear 100:
 > So far all three posts said (in so many words) that the aid stations were
 > not up to par. What really happened?  Crackers and M&M's only?

 No, there was a lot more than that, but not what some runners expected,
 based on previous experience running bigger, older 100s. I feel like I need
 to defend this race a bit . . .

 Jim O'Neil and I were actually surprised at how GOOD most of the aid
 stations were in the 60 miles we ran of the Bear, considering it's just
 the second year for the race and there were only 20 starters. Our
 expectations were actually too LOW; it wasn't as bare-bones as we
 thought it might be.  Volunteers far out-numbered the runners. Most
 worked the race the first year and came back because they enjoyed
 the experience so much. Even though they weren't all runners, there's
 a lot to be said for their enthusiasm and willingness to learn!  We
 were very grateful for their support.

 There was one ultrarunner ( whose name I can't remember) who very
 competently manned the aid station at 20/39 miles all by himself. He
 commented on the "publicity" I was giving Tropical John by wearing my
 Miwok 100K shirt, a race he's run. This fella either ran the Bear last
 year, or crewed/paced another runner, and decided to "man" that aid
 station this year to lend more ultra expertise. He was great!

 Most other folks we encountered were also very helpful and ASKED us
 for suggestions for next year. When asked, we suggested more solid
 food like turkey sandwiches and more hot soup at nite. The first aid
 station we hit after dark ran out of fuel to heat water for the soup and
 hot chocolate they had; that was a disappointment, but we ate (warm)
 hot dogs (a food I'd never touch any other time!) and they hit the spot.
 Unfortunately, that was an aid station where we didn't put drop bags
 with our own "emergency" food. Next time, we'll have one there so we
 can get something more substantial, if needed. [The young kids
 running around that aid station were a nuisance, too, but we didn't want
 to appear ungrateful or rude and tell the AS people they shouldn't have
 their *#$%&* kids camping overnite with them!]   :-)

 The 50/90-mile aid station where we spent a very cold nite when we
 dropped out was nearly out of water before any of the folks came back
 through the second time. That wasn't good, either. Fortunately, only 9
 runners came back through, and the next aid station 3 miles later, on
 the fastest section of the whole course, had plenty. They know real
 clearly to have more water there next year, and we didn't have to tell
 them that.

 This non-running father/son duo was also asleep when the front-runner,
 Hal Koemer, came flying through earlier than expected.  Poor Hal had
 to sign himself in and out and find something to drink by the light of his
 flashlight!!  He didn't complain, though. He was on a roll, trying to stay
 ahead of Leland. Hal had run (and won) the race last year, the first year
 of the race, and he had a great attitude about the laid-back style of the
 race. Even though he's young and hasn't done many 100s, he exemplifies
 the ultrarunner who's prepared for the worst and DEALS with it when it
 occurs. (Yes, he won, but his big lead dwindled in the gnarly new trail
 section in the last 7 miles when he got lost in the dark. He was gracious
 about that, too.)

 That same non-running aid station duo (Bill and Zach) at 50/90 miles
 also did their best to keep three of us who dropped there warm all night
 until we could run back to the finish in the morning (no crew cars came
 there, as we hoped). Jim's earlier post described the foam "cocoons"
 they crafted for us to sleep in. When they discovered I was shivering and
 couldn't sleep, they gave us their warm sleeping bags and tent to sleep in
 for several hours while they got up to greet the runners who straggled in
 at 90 miles in one-to-two-hour intervals during the long, freezing night.
 (Be forewearned, folks: it's dark and cold for *12* hours during this race,
 not 6 or 7 hours like summer 100s!). Bill and Zach loved helping the runners
 last year, returned this year, and want to do it again next year. They had
 as much enthusiasm as any volunteers I've ever met in any race, and
 solicited our feedback on how they can improve next time.

 Sure, we could've used more soup and sandwiches and other "real" food.
 But Jim and I have enuf experience running 100s to know that **it happens.
 You always have to prepare for the worst-case scenario, so we had 6 drop
 bags covering 9 of the 17 aid stations (3 were used twice on loops or out-
 and-back sections). We put in canned beef stew, PB&J sandwiches, Boost,
 V-8, Starbucks cappucino (caffeine!), pudding, gels, energy bars, Snickers,
 and other foods we know we can handle during 100s.

 We do this at "big" races, too. Even better-stocked races like Leadville,
 Vermont, and Arkansas may not have foods to which we are accustomed.
 And we do the same drill if we're crewing for each other, in case the crew
 person can't get to an aid station as planned (and in the Bear, not all the
 aid stations are accessible by vehicle).

 Bottom line: be prepared, and be flexible.

 RD Leland Barker is an experienced 100-miler. I don't know his ultra
 resume', but he won Wasatch in '99 and was 3rd there a month ago.
 He ran his own race this year, and has probably already talked with his
 aid station captains to give them feedback. He sort of bonked between
 50-58 miles himself, so maybe he realizes he and other participants
 could have done better with more solid food. Leland said before the
 race that he pretty much left it up to the aid station captains re: what
 they provided (i.e., loose guidelines). With the feedback he received
 from the runners this year, I think he'll give them more structure in the
 future so the aid station offerings will start to approximate what runners
 are used to in larger, more established races.

 But then, that might change the character of this small race. Leland
 wants it to grow slowly, and Jim and I agree. It's such a refreshing
 change from hyped, popular 100s we've run or worked, and we hope it
 stays small and charming.  We like it that way. (So please, don't
 everybody decide to run The Bear next year!)  :-)

 Cheers,
 Sue Norwood in beautiful Billings, MT
*****************************************************************

 This was very funny.  A light hearted humorous reply to Jim.  See below - Irv
 From Laurie in response to Bear 100's reputation for not serving caffeinated drinks.
 
 Hey Jim (re Bear 100 supplies at aid stations),

 Not only can you not get a Coke in Utah, but you will be ID'd for ordering coffee.  You will also find it very difficult to order anything on any menu anywhere that
 doesn't include Jell-o.  Further, you could be very easily held up, not by thieves, but by missionaries. They travel in pairs...they ride bicycles everywhere...they
 wear name tags at all times.  And they will corner you at the most inopportune times to talk about... "the scripture."

 And they've been known to set up ad-hoc aid-stations at Wasatch & provide nothing to eat nor drink...just the BOM (Book of Mormon).

 Be forewarned.  All those stories are really true.

 Barely hanging on to my sanity here in SLC,

 Laurie Staton
 l-staton@wcslc.edu
*******************************************************************************