Contact
us
Clinical
Applications
Projects:
Brain
Flattening
Brain
Mapping
Brain Movies
|
Note:
you will need an MPEG movie viewer to view
the movies on this page.
Introduction
Neurological assessment relies on two
main categories of technology:
-
tomographic reconstruction of structure
and hemodynamic/metabolic processes; and
-
recordings of electromagnetic fields.
These technologies have complementary
sensitivities. Hemodynamic assessment of brain activity using functional
magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is temporally limited by the latency
of the hemodynamic response, about 1 second, but can provide millimeter
spatial sampling. Electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography
(MEG) provide temporal resolution of less than 1 millisecond, but their
spatial resolution for multiple sources is ambiguous and limited. We have
developed a method which combines MEG with fMRI and structural MRI to obtain
high-resolution spatiotemporal maps of dynamic human brain activity. This
method is currently being extended to include EEG, a less-expensive, more
widely-available and clinically-validated alternative to MEG. The integrated
method is refined and tested in simulation studies as well as by direct
comparison with intracranial recordings in humans. The ultimate goal of
this project is an effective and validated method that unites the dominant
technologies used for neurological diagnosis. It is anticipated that this
method will have applications in the localization of epileptic foci for
presurgical planning and the sparing of cortex performing essential functions
in elective neurosurgery.
Examples of Anatomically-Constrained
MEG (aMEG)
Median nerve stimulation
One method of empirically
validating the aMEG methodology is to compare the localizations that it
derives in situations where the generator of the brain activity is thought
to already be known from previous intracranial studies in humans as well
as animal studies. By these criteria, the early (~20ms) response to median
n. stimulation is generated in the posterior and anterior banks of the
central sulcus of the contralateral hemisphere. aMEG assigns activation
to the predicted areas (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Snapshots of
brain movies at 20 ms after median nerve stimulation. Rolandic cortex in
the left hemisphere (left 2 images) responds only to right median
n. stimulation (second image). Similarly, Rolandic cortex in the right
hemisphere (right 2 images) responds only to left median n. stimulation
(third image).
Epilepsy
An important
clinical application of the proposed software is in localizing the origin
and propagation of interictal epileptiform spikes. aMEG of two spikes with
propagation from the frontal pole to the inferior frontal gyrus pars orbitalis
is shown in Figure 2. This subject was subsequently examined with subdural
grids and strips, which confirmed the aMEG localization (Figure 3, and
movie spike). Removal of this area resulted
in complete abolition of seizures.
Movie 1: Activity from
an epileptiform spike is seen to spread from the right frontal pole at
360 ms to the right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex 16 milliseconds later.
This pattern of spread was confirmed by direct intracranial recordings
and surgical removal of these areas has cured the patient's seizures.
(spike)
Figure 2. Snapshots from
aMEG movies of two epileptiform discharges. In both cases, the spike begins
in the right frontal pole and spreads 20ms later to involve the right inferior
frontal gyrus.
Movie 1- To see a movie
of spike 2 click here: spike
Figure 3. Intracranial
exploration of the patient shown in Figure 2 and Movie 1. Intraoperative
photos were taken of the cortical surface before and after placement of
the grid electrodes (white circles), and again after the cortectomy (hatched
area). These images are superimposed on the reconstructed cortical surface.
Note that subdural strips also sampled the frontal polar, orbital, medial
frontal, and anterior temporal cortex.
Combined MEG/EEG/fMRI studies
of motion processing
We have collected
fMRI, 32 channel EEG and 122 channel MEG data in the same subjects and
with similar stimuli , in an attempt to characterize the spatiotemporal
pattern of activity in human cortex in response to visual motion. In order
to test the overall consistency of the MEG activations with the corresponding
fMRI activations, we first estimated the activity at each point on the
cortical surface independent of the fMRI data (that is, using 0% fMRI weighting).
The estimated activity map over time evoked by motion onset is shown on
the left in Figure 4. Comparison with the fMRI activation to moving vs.
stationary visual stimuli (shown on the right) reveals a general similarity
between the two maps, suggesting a general agreement between neural activity,
as measured by MEG, and the hemodynamic response, as measured by fMRI.
This also suggests that our linear estimation approach provides a reasonably
accurate localization of MEG activity, even in the absence of fMRI data.
However, closer examination shows that the MEG-based solution is slightly
displaced anterodorsally to the fMRI measurement, suggesting that MEG with
anatomical constraints alone is not sufficient for a high-accuracy spatiotemporal
map.
Figure 4. Brain activation to low-contrast
moving stimuli: anatomically-constrained MEG (left), fMRI (right).
In a further
experiment, we investigated the differential response to coherent and incoherent
motion. The subjects viewed two types of rotation/dilation random dot flow
field stimuli. In one condition (coherent motion) each dot moved as part
of the same flow field, while in a other condition (incoherent motion)
each dot moved independently, but with the same local statistics as in
the coherent case. The time course of electrical activity for each point
on the cortical surface was estimated using our fMRI-weighted anatomically
constrained linear estimation approach. The solutions were weighted towards
all visual areas identified as motion specific for each subject using fMRI,
including V3A, MT, PSVA, and SPO. The estimated time-courses of activity
within the different visual areas are shown in a flattened representation
of the occipital lobe in Figure 5 for both coherent (red/purple) and incoherent
(green/cyan). (Waveforms are plotted separately for high and low random
dot density stimuli (hd and ld)).
Figure 5. Estimated Activity of Multiple
Visual Areas to Coherent and Incoherent Motion. Both
coherent and incoherent motion onset produce a complex sequence of activation
within the different visual areas.
The MEG response to coherent
and incoherent motion is estimated by the linear approach to be quite similar
in all areas, except in area SPO, where the response to coherent motion
is significantly greater than that to incoherent motion. Interestingly,
this is also the area which has been shown to be selective for coherent
motion by fMRI . Since the localization of the MEG motion coherence effect
was carried out independently of the fMRI motion coherence effect, the
fact that hey both localized to SPO provides further converging evidence
for the anatomical accuracy of the linear estimation approach.
Spatiotemporal imaging of
semantic processing and word-repetition effects
In semantic
judgment tasks involving words, repetition of a given word will result
in a large change in the cerebral activity that it evokes. According to
invasive EEG recordings as well as PET studies, this ‘repetition-effect’
is large and involves many extended cortical areas. Thus, the ‘repetition-effect’
provides a difficult but realistic case for testing the anatomically-constrained
fMRI-weighted linear estimation procedure from EEG/MEG data.
MEG/EEG
recordings were obtained in 4 normal subjects by reading a briefly-appearing
word from a monitor, and deciding if the object or animal that it represents
is more than a foot long in any dimension. In half of the blocks, all of
the words were novel, and in half the same set of words were repeatedly
presented. aMEG demonstrated a progression of activation to novel
words from primary visual cortex to inferotemporal, anterior temporal,
and finally ventrolateral prefrontal cortices. The same progression of
activation was found to repeated words, only it faded more quickly. In
the movie of novel minus repeated words, the repetition effect is seen
to involve many parts of the cortex, with the highest levels (ie Broca's
area) involved at least as early as the more perceptual levels. These findings
offer new insights into the progression of cortical events in memory.
Snapshots of this activation are shown in Figure 6 and a movie in size.
Movies of other verbal paradigms yield similar movies (see movie rhyme).
The identical
task was given during whole-head fMRI (Figure 7a). fMRI
activation was predominantly in the left hemisphere. Novel and repeated
words activated the retinotopic visual areas (V1-V4) and primary somatosensory
and motor areas approximately equally. Three bands of cortex consistently
responded more to novel than to repeated words: the occipitotemporal junction
(area 37); intraparietal sulcus including superior angular and supramarginal
gyrus (areas 7, 39, and 40); and postero-ventral prefrontal cortex.
Using
this differential fMRI response to novel and repeated stimuli to bias the
anatomically constrained inverse solution, we were able to estimate a spatiotemporal
map of the repetition effect. Figure 8 shows snapshots of the estimated
activity maps at 335, 370, and 510 ms post stimulus onset. By comparing
the fMRI biased solution shown in the top row (90% fMRI weighting) with
the independent anatomically constrained solution (0% fMRI weighting) shown
in the bottom row, we notice a strong overall similarity, again providing
further evidence for a general correspondence between electrical activity
and hemodynamic response. However, it is worth noting that the independent
anatomically constrained activations appear more spread out, presumably
reflecting the limited spatial resolution of MEG by itself. Note also that
the activity in the intraparietal sulcus is poorly localized unless fMRI-weightings
are added, and that the activity in Broca’s area is partially mis-allocated
to the anterior superior temporal plane in the independent anatomically
constrained solution. Adding fMRI constraints corrects this apparent misallocation.
Figure 6. Snapshots of brain activation
estimated from anatomically-constrained MEG.
Figure 7a. Above. fMRI responses to
Novel-minus-Fixation (left) and Novel-minus-Repeated words in a Size judgement
task.
Figure 7b. Below. Comparison of the
aMEG (left), and iEEG (right) responses to words in the Size task.
Figure 8. Brain areas differentially
activated by novel vs. repeated words in a size-judgement task.
Movie 2: To see a movie of the response
to novel words in a single subject in this task, click here: size.
In this movie, the responses
of four subjects' brains during a size judgement task are averaged using
surface morphing. The subjects read words that referred to objects
or animals. They pressed a key if the item was larger than 1 foot
in its longest dimension (e. g., elephant or house) and withheld their
response if it was not (e.g. fly or pin). The earliest response is
in the visual areas at the very back of the brain (occipital pole).
However, almost immediately, the activity goes forward to the temporal
pole, known to be inportant for semantic knowledge-- the sorts of facts
that this task uses. By 170 ms, the whole base of the occipital lobe
(used for higer visual processing of objects and patterns,) as well as
the temporal lobe, are are very active. At 230 ms, the temporal activity
is even more intense, but the occipital activity has greatly decreased.
By 365 ms, the activity has shifted even further anteriorly, and now heavily
involves the ventral posterior frontal cortex, again as an area intimately
involved in semantic knowledge and comparisons. Activation remains
strong for another 400 ms. However, as words are repeatedly processed
(Figure 7), the activation dies away much more quickly.
Movie 3: To see a movie of the response
to novel words in a different subject in a rhyming task, click here: rhyme.
The study
of behavior after strokes or other brain injury led to the discovery about
100 years ago of two brain areas that are essential for language:
Wernicke's area, in the posterior superior temporal lobe, and Broca's area,
in the posterobasal prefrontal cortex. This movie was made of a subject
who read words and decided if they thymed with "bay." The first significant
activation arrives in the Wernicke's area at about 100 ms after the word
exposure onset, only 30 ms after the first activity in the primary visual
cortex (hidden on the medial cortical surface). Gradually, this activity
intensifies and involves Broca's area and the temporal pole. The
temporal activity is maximal at about 265 ms after word onset and the frontal
activity at about 380 ms. By 440 ms, the activity is mainly frontal,
and by 560 ms, it has faded away.
Validation of noninvasive
estimates by comparison with intracranial recordings
A more direct
test of the accuracy of the noninvasive activity estimates comes from a
comparison anatomically constrained MEG (aMEG) with invasive recordings
in patients (iEEG). Figure 7b (left) shows the time-averaged anatomically
constrained estimate for the word repetition effect discussed above (here
averaged across four subjects), displayed on a folded brain. The generators
of potentials evoked by novel and repeated words, summarized from a previous
study of about 2500 iEEG recordings , are shown on the right. Such recordings
are only performed in epileptics and thus may be affected by pathology
and limited sampling. However, they can identify generators without the
ambiguities associated with all extracranial electromagnetic measures.
Note the close correspondence is seen between the iEEG-identified generators
of the components that change with word repetition (N4 and P3b), and those
estimated to change with repetition using aMEG.
As a further
test of the accuracy of the noninvasive estimates, the aMEG waveforms were
compared to ones actually measured in similar locations with intracranial
electrodes (Figure 9) from a previously published iEEG study . (Note
that there is no iEEG recording from the early visual cortex.) Thick lines
show the response to novel words, and thin lines the response to repeated
words. Although the general similarity between the aMEG and iEEG waveforms
provide further evidence for the accuracy of the noninvasive estimates,
further studies are needed in order to assess the accuracy within-subject,
with higher anatomical precision.
Figure 9. Comparison of anatomically
constrained MEG (aMEG) and invasive recordings (iEEG).
|