Soaring Hawk


Desert Hawk's World of Freethought

Around
This Site:

Home

What Is
Freethought?

Articles &
Essays

Hall of Fame

Quotes

Glossary

Links

About Me
(under
construction)

Email Me


 

What Is Freethought?

The term "freethinker" is most often associated with religion. Or perhaps I should say irreligion. It conjures up images of radical or militant anti-religionists and atheists, hell-bent on destroying people's beliefs merely for the sake of doing so. 

While it is true that most freethinkers are non-religionists and that the vast majority are atheists, the fact remains that freethought is not exclusive to irreligion. Note the following excerpt from well known freethinker Dan Barker:
 

free-think-er n. A person who forms opinions about religion on the basis of reason, independently of tradition, authority, or established belief. Freethinkers include atheists, agnostics and rationalists.

No one can be a freethinker who demands conformity to a bible, creed, or messiah. To the freethinker, revelation and faith are invalid, and orthodoxy is no guarantee of truth.
(Dan Barker, What Is A Freethinker?)

The leadership of the North Texas Church of Freethought sees things just a bit differently:
 

Freethinkers attach much more importance to the 'why' of belief than to the 'what.' Freethinkers believe in the sort of human understanding that naturally follows from a careful and rational consideration of the relevant factual evidence. With regard to the natural world of human experience, therefore, freethinkers regard the scientific method as the proper approach and scientific knowledge as the most reliable sort of human understanding. Freethinkers also acknowledge that there is an inner, private, subjective world of human experience. But they also recognize that our feelings and emotions cannot and should not be the basis of what we believe about the reality of the world which all human beings share.
(North Texas Church of Freethought, What Is A Freethinker?)

And one of the leading advocates of freethought, Bertrand Russell, saw things differently still:
 

What makes a free thinker is not his beliefs, but the way in which he holds them. If he holds them because his elders  told him they were true when he was young, or if he holds them because if he did not he would be unhappy, his thought  is not free; but if he holds them because, after careful thought, he finds a balance of evidence in their favor, then his thought is free, however odd his conclusions may seem.

Freethought is not about whether a belief is true--it is about the reasons an individual has for holding a belief. It's about intellectual freedom and integrity, and the precedence of reason over faith and credulity/gullibility. Anyone who holds a belief, whether religious or political or social, for reasons other than it is his/her personal reasonable conclusion, is clearly not a freethinker.

Once again, Bertrand Russell on freethought:
 

'Free thought' means thinking freely.…To be worthy of the name (freethinker) he must be free of two things: the force of tradition, and the tyranny of his own passions. No one is completely free from either, and in the measure of man's emancipation he deserves to be called a free thinker.

Read what others are saying about the philosophy and issues of freethought in Articles & Essays.

Top of Page