Titanosauria
Titanosauria is composed of a large
number of poorly known sauropods, among the last animals of their kind to have
existed. The animals listed here are traditionally listed as
titanosaurids, but since it's recognized that Titanosaurus itself is
based on dubious material that cannot be classified beyond Titanosauria,
Titanosauridae is not particularly useful. Titanosaurians commonly are either very large for sauropods or very small,
often with armor set in the skin (which when found
disassociated earlier was assumed to belong to ankylosaurians).
Titanosaurian armor comes in three general forms: mound-like, bulb-like, and
disc-like.
Another characteristic just now becoming appreciated is the
wide gauge hips, implying a somewhat different muscle arrangement and gait for
these animals compared to other sauropods. Wide gauge sauropod trackways
show up in the Jurassic, establishing the presence of titanosaurian-style
walking a bit before the actual titanosaurians show up. Their teeth are somewhat peglike, like diplodocid
teeth, but this is virtually their only similarity. Here is a chart showing some
important differences between the two groups:
| Character: | Group: | Titanosauria | Diplodocidae |
| Armor | present in some | none has been found | |
| Cervical\Dorsal Neural Spine | unsplit | split | |
| Sacrum | 6 verts | 5 verts | |
| Tail | like Brachiosauridae | whip-lash ending | |
| Chevrons | simple | skid-like | |
For a time, however, titanosaurians and diplodocids were considered to be very closely
related, which was excusable then, because no one was really sure what a
"titanosaurid"
was. However, it is now obvious that this cannot be. Skulls for
titanosaurians were
not known until this decade, although Mongolian sauropod skulls from the Seventies and
Eighties are now known to belong to probable derived titanosaurians, not to diplodocids
as they were first described.
Titanosauria is divided into several families by some workers, including Saltasauridae
and Andesauridae, which supposedly contains certain closely-related "basal
titanosaurid"-type sauropods.
Many titanosaurians come from LK South American formations whose ages
have not been pinned down yet. Also, several titanosaurians (Antarctosaurus
especially) are based on arbitrary assortments of remains, which may or may not all belong
together. Some actually were titanic in size, but there were also "pygmy"
titanosaurians, especially in areas thought to have been islands.
Titanosaurians are
still rather poorly known, and a lot of the taxa
aren't especially well defined.
As an interesting bit of trivia, a taxon named Succinodon
was once thought to be a member of Titanosauria, until it was discovered that the holotype
"jaw" was actually the filled burrowings of a mollusk.
Phytoliths (bits of silica that plants grow within themselves
to make them less palatable) have been found in LK Indian coprolites attributed
to titanosaurians. The interesting part about them is that grass
phytoliths are among them. Grass was long thought to have not appeared, or
at least not been of any importance, until the early Cenozoic, but these
phytoliths indicate diverse grasses formed part of the diet of titanosaurians.
These grasses were probably not really common yet. Other finds in South
America suggest that grasses first appeared in the southern continents in the
Cretaceous, which may explain some of the current blindness about them: Southern
Hemisphere continents have not been explored as well as the northern continents
when it comes to paleontology.
[Past Justin: "One day, you'll come here, and it will be completely cleared out and
reorganized."] This has come to pass, partially. I've set up
Saltasauridae, and turned this page into Titanosauria. Doubtless there is
some organization among the many sauropods on this page, but no one is quite
sure what it is, yet. Even these four lonely genera I have presented
between Titanosauria and Saltasauridae are only a rough guide. Since I
have placed so few of the taxa anywhere, this is probably the most accurate page
on titanosaurians on the Web! It's not often a lack of information makes
someone the most truthful, but I'll take it.
<--Titanosauria
|--Ligabuesaurus
|--Phuwiangosaurus
|--Tangvayosaurus
`--+--Andesaurus
|--Ampelosaurus
`--+--Lirainosaurus
`-->Saltasauridae
Titanosauria: As you can see by scrolling down the page, Titanosauria is one of the largest groups of
classic dinosaurs. It will likely continue to grow for a while, as
titanosaurian finds seem to be greatly increasing. They also have an unusual tendency to have generic names starting
with the letter A. A vast nesting colony of titanosaurians has recently been discovered in
Argentina, with some specimens showing skin impressions, and another
such possible colony was uncovered in Spain. Numerous undescribed forms
are turning up at a frightening pace, some including cranial material.
Argentina is particularly rich.
| Taxon or Taxa: | Time\Place: | Comments: |
| Ligabuesaurus leanzai Bonaparte, González Riga, and Apesteguía, 2006 | Aptian (EK) of Argentina | This basal titanosaurian is known from a partial maxilla, six cervicals and dorsals, and partial limbs and scapulacoracoids. It converges on Brachiosaurus with its long forelimbs. This name had been floating around the Internet for a couple of years prior to publication. |
| Phuwiangosaurus sirindhornae Martin, Buffetaut, and Suteethorn, 1994 | Valanginian-Hauterivian (EK) of Thailand | Known from material belonging to several individuals, this sauropod is also known to possess bifid neural spines. |
| Tangvayosaurus hoffeti Allain, Taquet, Battail, Dejax, Richir, Veran, Limon-Duparcaneur, Vacant, Mateus, Sayarath, Khenthavong, and Phouyavong, 1999 | Aptian-Albian (EK) of Laos | Tangvayosaurus, a recently-named sauropod, shows some similarities to Phuwiangosaurus, although the condition of its neural spines is uncertain, making it possible that this animal is really a basal titanosaurian. 2 to 3 individuals are known, with the type including pubes, an ischia, dorsals, caudals, ribs, a partial humerus, and a femur. |
| Andesaurus delgadoi Calvo and Bonaparte, 1991 | Cenomanian-early Turonian (LK) of Argentina | This sauropod is the best-known example of a basal titanosaurian. It shows some resemblance to Argentinosaurus and, interestingly, Haplocanthosaurus. |
| Ampelosaurus atacis Le Loeuff, 1995 | early Maastrichtian (LK) of France | This basal titanosaurian is known from copious material from several individuals that comprises most of a skeleton. A number of interesting types of armor have been found from it. Several other undescribed titanosaurians are known from the same area. |
| Lirainosaurus astibiae Sanz, Powell, Le Loeuff, Martinez, and Pereda-Suberbiola, 1999 | late Campanian-?early Maastrichtian (LK) of Spain | This saltasaurid appears to be somewhat less derived than Saltasaurus, possibly as the sister group to Saltasauridae. It is known from the remains of several individuals, including skull material and armor. |
Titanosauria i.s.: The taxa here display great diversity for large sauropods. Some of the more basal species are brachiosaurid-like, while other are close to the base of Saltasauridae, with everything in between covered. A titanosaurian braincase from the late Aptian or early Albian (EK) of Texas has recently been described. At the early end, Bathonian (MJ) tracks from England appear to be titanosaurian in origin.
| Taxon or Taxa: | Time\Place: | Comments: | |
| Aegyptosaurus baharijensis Stromer, 1932 | Albian-early Cenomanian (EK-LK) of Egypt | This average titanosaurian is based on a partial skeleton, including most of the limbs, which allow us to know about the relative ratios of the limb bones in titanosaurians. Unfortunately, we have to go on figures, as the type material was destroyed in WWII. | |
| ?Agustinia ligabuei Bonaparte, 1999 (originally Augustia Bonaparte, 1998) | Aptian (EK) of Argentina | This is a very unusual sauropod. It appears to have
had plates not unlike Stegosaurus, only oriented with the faces
forward and backward rather than side to side. Spines are also
present. The original name turned out to be
preoccupied (Zariquiey, 1927) by an insect, necessitating the name change. Some
researchers have linked it with rebbachisaurids. An osteoderm from the Hauterivian-Barremian (EK) of Croatia is similar. |
|
| Amargatitanis macni Apesteguia, 2007 | Barremian (EK) of Argentina | Known from six caudals, a scapula, a femur, and an astragalus, Amargatitanis is an early titanosaur. Its scapula was wide, flat, and robust. | |
| "Antarctosaurus": | "A." giganteus (N.D.) Huene, 1929 | Coniacian (LK) of Argentina | As the name suggests, this is a large animal. It probably is not Antarctosaurus. |
| "A." jaxartensis (N.D.) Riabinin, 1939 | Turonian-Santonian (LK) of Kazakhstan | Vast differences in location and time make it unlikely that this taxon belongs in Antarctosaurus. | |
| Argentinosaurus huinculensis Bonaparte and Coria, 1993 | Cenomanian-early Turonian (LK) of Argentina | This recently-described basal titanosaurian, known from limb bones and vertebrae, may well be the largest known dinosaur. | |
| Argyrosaurus superbus Lydekker, 1893 | ?late Cenomanian-early Turonian (LK) of Argentina; other reports unverified | This titanosaurian is difficult to pin down due to the fact that it is based only on very large, arbitrarily assigned limb bones. | |
| Austrosaurus mckillopi Longman, 1933 | Albian (EK) of Australia | Unusual for being so basal so late, Austrosaurus has auditioned with Brachiosauridae, Camarasauridae, "Cetiosauridae", and "Titanosauridae", without finding a good fit. New study puts it as a titanosaurian, more derived than Malawisaurus. Brachiosaurid-like material from the Cenomanian (LK) of Australia, including some referred to informally as the "Hughenden sauropod," may belong here as well. | |
| Balochisaurus malkani Malkani, 2006 | Maastrichtian (LK) of Pakistan | Balochisaurus is based on caudal verts and was assigned to the Balochisauridae (saltasaurids). | |
| Baurutitan britoi Kellner, Campos, and Trotta, 2005 | Campanian-Maastrichtian (LK) of Brazil | This titanosaur is known from a sacral and 18 caudals, referred to in earlier works as "DGM Series C", a less-famous neighbor of the "Peirópolis titanosaur" (Trigonosaurus). | |
| Bonitasaura salgadoi Apesteguia, 2004 | Santonian (LK) of Argentina | Bonitasaura was a smallish titanosaurian (on the order of 7 meters long as a subadult). Known from bones from most of the major parts of the body and belonging to one individual, its lower jaw suggests the presence of a keratinous beak; teeth are peglike and confined to the rostral tip of the squared-front jaw, while a sharp "guillotine" ridge runs along behind the teeth, on the bone making up the lateral sides of the jaw. This throws an interesting wrench in the recent interpretations of Antarctosaurus as a chimera made up of saltasaurid postcranial material and a rebbachisaurid jaw (rebbachisaurids are also known to have jaws with strongly squared-off front margins): perhaps the jaw and postcrania really do go together, with the jaw form just an example of convergence to address similar niches. Rebbachisaurids appear to have more replacement teeth set for action (remember, dinosaurs replaced teeth continuously) than Bonitasaura, giving a way to tell the two jaw types apart (well, that and the sharp ridge on Bonitasaura, too). It may turn out to be a nemegtosaurine. | |
| Brohisaurus kirthari Malkani, 2003 | LJ of Pakistan | This is a new sauropod based on fragmentary limb bones. It was originally assigned to the Pakisauridae (titanosaurids), so I put it with the titanosaurians. | |
| Chubutisaurus insignis Corro, 1975 | ?Coniacian-?Maastrichtian (LK) of Argentina | Known from two partial skeletons, this animal appears to be very close to the base of Titanosauria. It was originally thought of as older (?Aptian). | |
| Epachthosaurus sciuttoi Powell, 1990 | late Cenomanian-early Turonian (LK) of Argentina | Another basal titanosaurian, this animal is not as well known as some of the others, but new finds including most of a skeleton should change that. It might prove to be an unarmored titanosaurian. | |
| Futalognkosaurus dukei Calvo, Porfiri, González-Riga, and Kellner, 2007 | Coniacian (LK) of Argentina | Also known as the more pronounceable "Futalongkosaurus", this is currently the most completely known giant sauropod, with all of the cervicals, dorsals, and sacrals accounted for. It would have been around 32 to 34 meters long, with a hefty neck. Phylogenetic analysis puts it closest to Mendozasaurus, and the two may form a cozy little Lognkosauria with Malawisaurus as sister group. | |
| Gobititan shenzhouensis You, Tang, and Luo, 2003 | Albian-?Cenomanian (EK-?LK) of China | Based on caudal vertebrae and a left hindlimb, this sauropod was described as a basal titanosaurian. It is said to be close to Tangvayosaurus. | |
| Gondwanatitan faustoi Kellner and de Azevedo, 1999 (?Aeolosaurus) | Santonian (LK) of Brazil | This is a recently described titanosaurian (although not particularly large, despite the name). It may be synonymous with Aeolosaurus, and is known from material including two cervicals, seven dorsals, six sacrals, 24 caudals, part of a scapula, much of the hips, humeri, and tibiae. | |
| Hypselosaurus priscus (N.D.) Matheron, 1869 | Maastrichtian (LK) of France | Based on disassociated remains, it is difficult to tell what Hypselosaurus constitutes, beyond a titanosaurian of some sort. Sometimes large eggs from France are referred to this taxon, without much evidence. | |
| Jainosaurus septentrionalis Hunt, Lockley, Lucas, and Meyer, 1995 (originally Antarctosaurus septentrionalis Huene and Matley, 1933) | Maastrichtian (LK) of India | This sauropod, based on material including a braincase, shoulder girdle, and forelimb, has been considered a giant individual of Titanosaurus, but since the latter is so poorly defined, we may never be able to know for certain. | |
| ?Jiangshanosaurus lixianensis Tang, Kang, Jin, Wei, and Wu, 2001 | late early Albian (EK) of China | This new sauropod is allied with the titanosaurians because of the structure of its shoulder girdle and vertebrae. It is not to be confused with the prosauropod Jingshanosaurus. Parts of the pelvic girdle and femur are also known. | |
| Karongasaurus gittelmani Gomani, 2005 | EK of Malawi | Contemporary of Malawisaurus, this
titanosaurian is based on a partial lower jaw and some referred
teeth. It may have been fairly derived, given that the form of the
teeth and their position in the mandible suggests a longer, lower skull
than that of Malawisaurus, which would be more in line with
saltasaurids like Nemegtosaurus and Rapetosaurus. It
could also conceivably be a diplodocoid, but no diplodocoid postcranial
remains are known from the area. This may also be the first classical dinosaurian taxon published in an electronic-only format; we'll see how that goes. |
|
| Khetranisaurus barkhani Malkani, 2006 | Maastrichtian (LK) of Pakistan | Khetranisaurus is another of a group of apparent titanosaurians from the Maastrichtian of Pakistan, based on caudals. There is a dichotomy of what are called balochisaurids (saltasaurids) and pakisaurids (titanosaurids) with these genera, and Khetranisaurus is grouped with the pakisaurids by the describer. | |
| Laplatasaurus araukanicus Huene, 1929 | ?late Cenomanian-early Turonian, possibly up to Campanian (LK) of Argentina | A large titanosaurian, Laplatasaurus is known from a large number of elements that may or may not belong to the same taxon. Some workers have suggested referring it to Titanosaurus, but I am refraining for the moment because of the taxonomic fuzziness of T. indicus. | |
| Loricosaurus scutatus (N.D.) Huene, 1929 (?Saltasaurus or Neuquensaurus) | early Maastrichtian (LK) of Argentina | At one time considered an ankylosaurian, this armored sauropod may instead be a synonym of Saltasaurus or Neuquensaurus. | |
| Marisaurus jeffi Malkani, 2006 | Maastrichtian (LK) of Pakistan | Marisaurus, based on caudals, was aligned with the balochisaurids (saltsaurids) by its describer. | |
| Mendozasaurus neguyelap Gonzalez Riga, 2003 | late Turonian-late Coniacian (LK) of Argentina | Just as Khaan provides a little bit of fun for Star Trek fans, Mendozasaurus brings a little bit of joy to dedicated Simpsons fans ("Mendozaaaah!"). Anyway, levity behind us, this is a titanosaurian based in large part on 22 caudals and limb material. It is armored, and may be a basal titanosaurian, but more derived than Malawisaurus. Recently, more material has been found from the type locality, including short wide cervicals as in Isisaurus. The two may be related. Futalognkosaurus also appears to be related. | |
| ?Mongolosaurus haplodon Gilmore, 1933 | EK of Mongolia | Based on cervicals and unusual teeth, Mongolosaurus has been considered as everything from a diplodocid to a nemegtosaurine to (unofficially) a therizinosaurian. | |
| Muyelensaurus pecheni Calvo, González-Riga, and Porfiri, 2007 | Turonian-early Coniacian (LK) of Argentina | Described as a slender titanosaur, Muyelensaurus is known from a braincase, verts from throughout the column, and various appendicular bones. It may be closest to Rinconsaurus. | |
| Pakisaurus balochistani Malkani, 2006 | Maastrichtian (LK) of Pakistan | Next in the caudal-based titanosaurians of Pakistan, Pakisaurus was identified as a pakisaurid. | |
| Paralititan stromeri J. B. Smith, Lamanna, Lacovara, Dodson, J. R. Smith, Poole, Giegengack, and Attia, 2001 | early Cenomanian (LK) of Egypt | A new, extremely large titanosaurian, Paralititan is based on material including a humerus, shoulder girdle, and caudal verts. It apparently lived in an ancient mangrove environment. | |
| "Pelorosaurus" becklesii Mantell, 1852 | Berriasian-Valanginian (EK) of England | Based on a forelimb with skin impressions, this animal is, based on the proportions of limb bones, a titanosaurian, not a brachiosaurid-type animal like true Pelorosaurus. | |
| ?"Pleurocoelus" valdensis (N.D.) Lydekker, 1889 | Barremian (EK) of England | This is an indeterminate ?titanosaurian based on small, possibly juvenile teeth, with some vertebrae centra referred. | |
| Puertasaurus reuili Novas, Salgado, Calvo, and Agnolin, 2005 | early Maastrichtian (LK) of Argentina | Puertasaurus is based on most of a cervical, a dorsal, and two caudal centra, and really came out of left field for me. I don't have much information to put up here right now, except that it was regarded as a titanosaurid, was apparently very large (absurdly large vertebrae), had large neural spines on the cervicals, and had short (length) anterior dorsals. | |
| Sulaimanisaurus gingerichi Malkani, 2006 | Maastrichtian (LK) of Pakistan | The final (alphabetically speaking) caudal-based titanosaurian from Pakistan, Sulaimanisaurus was aligned with Pakisauridae. | |
| Titanosaurus indicus (N.D.) Lydekker, 1877 | Maastrichtian (LK) of India | This sauropod is based on caudals and a femur. Obviously, these remains are somewhat sparse for founding a genus, let alone a family. Some of the referred material may not even be titanosaurian. | |
| "Titanosaurus": | "Titanosaurus" falloti (N.D.) Hoffet, 1942 | Coniacian-Maastrichtian (LK) of Laos | This poorly known sauropod seems to be close to (?is) Tangvayosaurus and its allies. |
| "T." lydekkeri (N.D.) Huene, 1929 | ?Albian (EK) of England | This obscure possible titanosaurian is based on a vertebra. | |
| "T." madagascariensis (N.D.) Deperet, 1896 | mid Maastrichtian (LK) of Madagascar; ?Maastrichtian (LK) of ?India | This sauropod is based on caudals with associated armor, making it the first titanosaurian to be considered to have body armor. It is sometimes referred to Laplatasaurus, for no apparent reason | |
| "T." valdensis (N.D.) Huene, 1929 | Barremian (EK) of England | This sauropod, also known as Iuticosaurus, based on worn caudals, is one of the few definite example of Wealden titanosaurians. | |
| Venenosaurus dicrocei Tidwell, Carpenter, and Meyer, 2001 | mid Aptian (EK) of Utah | Similar to the earlier Yellow Cat member, Cedar Mountain Formation sauropod Cedarosaurus, this new seemingly small basal titanosaurian, from the Poison Strip Member, is based on vertebral and limb remains. Other material, including juvenile remains, may belong here. | |
| Navigation | ||
| Home Page | Alphabetical Dinosaur Index | Clado-Index |
| Background Information | Glossary | Faunae |