|
My friend, Kara Kliess, on hearing I was taking
a writing course wrote a short letter to me commenting on the benefits of formal writing
classes to a writer's career. In it she states:
| "To
me, one doesn't normally have an eye for the details that count until one has studied the
matter. Sure, there are musicians who play by ear, but they are not usually classical
musicians, musicians who take years to study their art." |
I don't
know much about other writers and I don't know much about musicians. But I do know a bit
about a sport called baseball. Baseball is similar to writing (and being a classical
musician I suppose) in a number of ways. You don't have to be over 6'-5" or weigh 275
pounds or run fast or be a certain shape or even a select gender. You don't need a degree
nor does it matter if you are young or old. You don't need to have money nor do you need
to know someone in the business in order to excel in baseball. Like writing and music,
baseball is an undertaking where failure is the norm yet the few successes that come to us
are what folks remember. The people unequaled in the sport fail six times out of ten. (How
many times was your story rejected before it was published?) The good ones fail seven
times out of ten and the mediocre eight. That's an awful lot of failure compared to
success. This is true whether youre speaking about the professional game, a little
league match or even a beer-belly contest at a company picnic.
Ted
Williams, the last professional ballplayer to hit .400, said, "The hardest single thing in sports is to hit a round ball
thrown at high speeds with a round bat."
Perhaps the same could be said of writing a novel or a decent poem. What does it take to
be good at it? I think the formula requires three ingredients. You need ability, skill and
luck. It is difficult to reach the professional level in any endeavor without a
combination of these three elements.
There are two types
of ability, natural and learned. Skill is a refinement honed through repetition. Luck
seems to just happen, but actually it's brought about by the combination of applied
ability and skill. The longer you keep plugging away at something the more luck you seem
to have where its concerned. Skill, being a refinement of ability, takes longer for some
to acquire than for other people. There are ballplayers who make it in the big leagues
without ever posting a single at bat in the minors. Others take years to work their way
up. Is a person who hits .300 in his first year in the majors without any minor league
experience a better hitter than the person who, after ten years in the minors, finally
makes it to the bigs and hits .300? No. They're both .300 hitters.
The same is true in
writing. Is the person who gets published the first time he submits a story a better
writer than one who takes ten years to reach his goal? I dont think thats
true. So we come to ability, natural vs. learned, which is basically what my friend Kara
wrote about.
You must have natural ability to some degree to excel
at anything. You must also have learned ability. However, the percentages of each that
show up in a star professional may vary immensely. Babe Ruth was a natural ballplayer. He
was coached on certain fundamentals so he had learned ability, but his skill came mostly
from his natural resources. When asked to give advice to youngsters on how to hit better
he said, "All I can tell them
is pick a good one and sock it. I get back to the dugout and they ask me what it was I hit
and I tell them I don't know except it looked good."
Yogi Berra, one of the best clutch hitters in the
history of the game was much the same. On being told by his manager in his early years
that he'd be more successful as a hitter if he'd think when he goes up to the plate, Berra
responded, "Think! How the
hell are you gonna think and hit at the same time!" Berra denies saying that but it is still widely attributed to him. Yogi did tip
his cap to the thinking ballplayer by saying, "Baseball is 90% mental. The other half is physical."
Ty
Cobb and the aforementioned Ted Williams, on the other hand, had more learned than natural
ability. Both worked for hours daily to hone their craft and were active students of the
art of hitting. They could speak for hours about the hows and whys of their success. Cobb
said, "The longer I live, the
longer I realize that hitting is more a mental matter than it is physical. The ability to
grasp the bat, swing at the proper time, take a proper stance, all these are elemental.
Batting rather is a study in psychology, a sizing up of pitcher and catcher, and observing
little details that are of immense importance. It's like the study of crime, the work of a
detective as he picks up clues."
Williams once observed, "There
has always been a saying in baseball that you can't make a hitter. But I think you can
improve a hitter. More than you can improve a fielder. More mistakes are made hitting than
in any other part of the game." He also got
the quote right, Mr. Berra, "Hitting
is 50% above the shoulders."
So which ability is
better? Purely natural or natural combined with learned? Cobb and Williams both hit over
.400 in their careers. Berra and Ruth never managed the feat. But Cobb and Williams also
had something else that was not apparent in either Berra or Ruth. That ingredient was an
inner fire to be the very best at what they were doing.
 |
Cobb described it this way, "Every great batter works on
the theory that the pitcher is more afraid of him than he is of the pitcher." To
which he added, "I had to fight all my life to survive. They were all against
me... but I beat the bastards and left them in the ditch." When Williams was
psyching himself up in the on-deck circle before stepping up to the plate he'd say to
himself, "My name is Ted fucking Williams and I'm the greatest hitter in
baseball." By the time he stepped into the batters box he actually felt sorry
for the pitcher. Ruth even acknowledged Cobb's fiery drive, saying, "Cobb
is a prick. But he sure can hit. God Almighty, that man can hit." So I maintain
there's not that much difference between natural and learned ability. Yet I do think to
reach the top of any profession, writing, music, or anything else, you need to acquire
that fiery drive. |
|
|
If that's the
case, Kara, perhaps each time you sit at your keyboard to knock out a short story, whether
by inner soul or set procedure, you should state graphically, categorically, and with
authority, "My name is Kara
fucking Kliess and I'm the greatest writer who's ever lived!"

|